Wednesday, May 16, 2012

What Your Real Estate Agent Has to Tell You, But Your Financial Advisor May Not

The financial services industry should take a page from the real estate industry when it comes to transparency with clients. When you are a customer, a salesperson’s job is to sell you a product or a service. While salespeople have a duty to be honest and fair with you, they don’t have a duty to put your interests ahead of theirs. It’s your job to evaluate their claims and products, then to make an informed decision whether or not to buy.

A client relationship is much different. In this case you are typically buying the wisdom and services of an advocate. This is similar to the relationship you have with people in the legal and medical professions. It’s the job of the professionals to put your needs above theirs. When professionals call you their “client,” it means they have a fiduciary duty to put your best interests first and be your advocate.

In some cases, like buying or selling a house, you get to choose whether to be a customer or a client. About thirty years ago the real estate industry was where the financial services industry is today. Many buyers or sellers were unclear, when they retained a real estate agent, as to the agent’s fiduciary duty. Even though an agent might show a buyer lots of houses, the agent technically worked for the seller. This was confusing, especially to buyers who often thought of the agent who hauled them around for days showing them houses as “their” agent. It was equally confusing to real estate agents, who often worked “for” the buyer even though their fiduciary duty was to the seller. That is no longer the situation in most states today. Real estate agents must give you the choice of having the real estate agent work for you (where you will be the client) or work for the other party (where you will be the customer). In some cases the agent is allowed to work for both buyer and seller, meaning the agent doesn’t work for either party. The agents are required to fully disclose whether you are the customer or the client. If you are the customer, you have the opportunity to retain and become the client of your own agent.

Ironically, despite the recent proposed reforms in the financial services industry, there is very little to no transparency or disclosure required of financial salespeople.

Most investors are confused about which financial professionals are held to a fiduciary standard. Some 75% of consumers believed “their” financial advisors had a fiduciary duty to put their interests first. In actuality, less than 20% of the advisors were fiduciaries. Most consumers thought they were clients, but they were actually customers. This is especially serious, since most people are left thinking they are getting unbiased financial advice when they are actually getting a sales pitch.
Why is the financial services industry so far behind the real estate industry when it comes to transparency and disclosure? Probably because the financial services industry is far more consolidated than the real estate industry and has a lot of influence on Capitol Hill.

Don’t assume you are a client rather than a customer. Demand clear answers, and go elsewhere if you don't get them. Demand the same level of disclosure from a financial services professional that you would get from a real estate professional.

Contributed by Rick Kahler, CFP

1 comment:

StephaniePumphrey said...

The best real estate agents are often not those who pepper their faces all over television and print advertisements.
real estate agent noosa